2015 Annual Meeting Info
 The 2015 Annual Meeting, held on February 22, 2015 at Farmington High School, 10 Montieth Drive, Farmington, 
CT, was highlighted by the presence of Dr. Douglas Owsley of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History.
In a nearly 2-hour talk, Dr. Owsley described not only the history of the finding and legal wrangling associated
with the discovery, examination and ultimate fate of the skeleton but -- even more interesting -- the variety of
tools he and his associates used to examine in detail the skeleton and what conclusions they were able to draw
from it.
The skeleton itself was first discovered in 1996 by two college students watching boat races on the Columbia 
River near Kennewick, Washington, who stumbled across a human skull in the shallow water near the shore.  After
reporting this to the police, subsequent investigations showed that the skeleton was between 8,430 and 9,200
years old; and this led to a historic legal confrontation, bitter political debates, and intense debates between 
scientists, government officials, the US Army Corps of Engineers, and Native American tribes over who should 
control such ancient finds ... and, who gets to decide. Dr. Owsley, a forensic anthropologist, was one of the 
principal scientists engaged in carefully choreographed examinations of the skeleton, stretching over 16 days, 
which were allowed them.  Some of their findings included the following:
Note: Where an image is shown below, click it to get a larger view. All images shown here, as
well as others, can be found in the Meeting's image collection, along with explanatory captions.
 His right ilium (upper bone of the hip) had a small projectile point embedded in it. This is not what killed him,
as the bone had partially grown around the point, which itself had shattered on impact; and that it occurred 
perhaps 20 years prior to his death. Based on the angle of the point, it's hypothesized that it was thrown at
him from a distance of perhaps 30 yards ... with enough force to knock him off his feet on impact.
His right ilium (upper bone of the hip) had a small projectile point embedded in it. This is not what killed him,
as the bone had partially grown around the point, which itself had shattered on impact; and that it occurred 
perhaps 20 years prior to his death. Based on the angle of the point, it's hypothesized that it was thrown at
him from a distance of perhaps 30 yards ... with enough force to knock him off his feet on impact.  The man's skull was relatively narrow and elongated.  There was also evidence of considerable wear on his teeth,
reminiscent of those seen in early Eskimos and others who routinely worked seal hide with their mouths to soften
it.
The man's skull was relatively narrow and elongated.  There was also evidence of considerable wear on his teeth,
reminiscent of those seen in early Eskimos and others who routinely worked seal hide with their mouths to soften
it. Using his experience with various human groups as a guide, Dr. Owsley made morphometic measurements of the
skull, looking at relative sizes of the zygomatic (cheek) bone, brow ridges, jaw and nasal cavities, and
comparing them with contemporary Native American and European (actually a Civil War veteran) skulls, and found
that the Kennewick Man had neither European, Native American nor Polynesian ancestral roots, but instead shared 
roots with coastal East Asian peoples.
Using his experience with various human groups as a guide, Dr. Owsley made morphometic measurements of the
skull, looking at relative sizes of the zygomatic (cheek) bone, brow ridges, jaw and nasal cavities, and
comparing them with contemporary Native American and European (actually a Civil War veteran) skulls, and found
that the Kennewick Man had neither European, Native American nor Polynesian ancestral roots, but instead shared 
roots with coastal East Asian peoples. A forensic reconstruction of his skull was made, allowing us to see what he may well have looked like ... with
necessary allowance being made for head and hair. (Lacking any soft tissues, we cannot determine whether
there were things such as scars, tattoos, and so forth, either.)
A forensic reconstruction of his skull was made, allowing us to see what he may well have looked like ... with
necessary allowance being made for head and hair. (Lacking any soft tissues, we cannot determine whether
there were things such as scars, tattoos, and so forth, either.) Examination of calcium carbonate deposits on the bones along the river allowed researchers to determine that he
had been buried, face up, at a slight angle with the head a little higher than the feet. The presence of 
carbonate deposits on one side of the bones, where the mineral collected (it was dissolved in the river water
initially) after gravitic deposition from above.  (This is a part of the science of taphonomy, the study of the
how human and other remains fossilize or are otherwise affected by their surroundings after death.
Examination of calcium carbonate deposits on the bones along the river allowed researchers to determine that he
had been buried, face up, at a slight angle with the head a little higher than the feet. The presence of 
carbonate deposits on one side of the bones, where the mineral collected (it was dissolved in the river water
initially) after gravitic deposition from above.  (This is a part of the science of taphonomy, the study of the
how human and other remains fossilize or are otherwise affected by their surroundings after death. Unfortunately, this is only an overview of his talk. Many more details and images can be found in Dr. 
Owsley's book Kennewick Man: The Scientific Investigation of an Ancient American Skeleton, and in another 
book by James B. Chatters, Ancient Encounters: Kennewick Man and the First Americans who also studied the 
skeleton.
> To view a flyer for the meeting, please click 
> To access the Program accompanying this meeting, please click 
     
> To read an article on Kennewick Man, put out by the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, please 
click Kennewick Man.
> For a biographical sketch of Dr. Owsley on Wikipedia, please 
click Douglas Owsley.
> Webmaster's Note: In the Spring 2008 FOSA Newsletter, an article appeared giving an update of the 
then-ongoing analysis of the Kennewick Man.  Readers can access a reprint of the article by clicking 
Preceding this was the "business" portion of the meeting. Highlights include:
> Recording Secretary Mike Cahill provided a year-in-review report on FOSA's 2014 activities.
> Nick Bellantoni spoke of his work at State Archaeologist leading up to his retirement last July; and of
his work with the Archaeological Society of Connecticut, of which he's now a Board member.
> Brian Jones spoke of his work this past year since his becoming Connecticut's State Archaeologist, thanking
FOSA members for all of the invaluable volunteer work they've provided.
> Scott Brady discussed this year's Nominations to the Board of Directors and for Correspondence Secretary.
> Mike Raber presented Certificate Achievement Awards, to Cynthia Redman for her work during her 3 terms as
FOSA President, her organizational and leadership skills and work in the FOSA library; and to Joan McCarthy for
her work as FOSA's Corresponding Secretary, an often anonymous and at-times thankless job which is nevertheless 
an absolutely necessary one.  Both of their certificates can be viewed by clicking 
 .
.
> All this was kept in motion by FOSA President Mandy Ranslow, who also noted that this year's Archaeology
Fair will be held on October 17 at Central Connecticut State University.
Images in this section courtesy of Jim Hall.